Metabolic syndrome index measurement tool (MSI): scale development, reliability and validity study

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Aim: Identifying the risks of metabolic syndrome (MetS) can lead to early targeted interventions and thus contribute to improved quality of life by reducing the risk of developing MetS, diabetes or heart disease in the future. We aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure the MetS risk of the population. Materials and methods: In the methodological study, an item pool was created by reviewing the literature. Pre-application was performed after the weighting of the items whose content validity was ensured by taking expert opinions. Data were collected from 43 patients with MetS from a state hospital affiliated to the Ministry of Health and 405 individuals without MetS from the community, from a total of 448 individuals using the Individual Information Form, Finnish Diabetes Risk Scale (FINDRISC) and Metabolic Syndrome Index (MSI). The data obtained were evaluated using SPSS 22.0 and MedCalc 19.1 statistical programmes. Scale discrimination was analyzed by independent samples t-test between the upper and lower 27% groups. The cut-off point of the scale score in predicting the diagnosis of MetS was tested by ROC analysis. Correlation analysis was performed with the parallel form for criterion validity. Results: As a result of the ROC analysis, a perfectly compatible scale with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 85.43% and a cut-off score of 48 was obtained. When the correlation analyses between MSI and FINDRISC scores were examined for criterion validity, a positive moderate (r = 0.632, p < 0.001) correlation was found between FINDRISC and MSI. When the discrimination of the scale was analysed, it was found that there was a significant difference between the lower 27% and upper 27% groups (p < 0.05) and it was revealed that the MSI made sensitive measurements to discriminate. Conclusions: The MSI scale is a valid and reliable tool for early detection of MetS risk.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11522Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21304-7Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
2
WoS
2
OpenAlex
2
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAkeren, Zahide
dc.contributor.authorApaydın, Emine
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:08:29.343434315Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:08:29.343434315Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractAim: Identifying the risks of metabolic syndrome (MetS) can lead to early targeted interventions and thus contribute to improved quality of life by reducing the risk of developing MetS, diabetes or heart disease in the future. We aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure the MetS risk of the population. Materials and methods: In the methodological study, an item pool was created by reviewing the literature. Pre-application was performed after the weighting of the items whose content validity was ensured by taking expert opinions. Data were collected from 43 patients with MetS from a state hospital affiliated to the Ministry of Health and 405 individuals without MetS from the community, from a total of 448 individuals using the Individual Information Form, Finnish Diabetes Risk Scale (FINDRISC) and Metabolic Syndrome Index (MSI). The data obtained were evaluated using SPSS 22.0 and MedCalc 19.1 statistical programmes. Scale discrimination was analyzed by independent samples t-test between the upper and lower 27% groups. The cut-off point of the scale score in predicting the diagnosis of MetS was tested by ROC analysis. Correlation analysis was performed with the parallel form for criterion validity. Results: As a result of the ROC analysis, a perfectly compatible scale with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 85.43% and a cut-off score of 48 was obtained. When the correlation analyses between MSI and FINDRISC scores were examined for criterion validity, a positive moderate (r = 0.632, p < 0.001) correlation was found between FINDRISC and MSI. When the discrimination of the scale was analysed, it was found that there was a significant difference between the lower 27% and upper 27% groups (p < 0.05) and it was revealed that the MSI made sensitive measurements to discriminate. Conclusions: The MSI scale is a valid and reliable tool for early detection of MetS risk.
dc.identifier.articlenumber51
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-025-21304-7
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC11705882
dc.identifier.pmid39762795
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85214262925
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11522
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001391766000012
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectMeasurement tool
dc.subjectMetabolic syndrome
dc.subject.classificationPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherAged
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherFinland
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMetabolic Syndrome
dc.subject.otherMiddle Aged
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.otherRisk Assessment
dc.subject.otherROC Curve
dc.subject.otherSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subject.otherSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.otherdiagnosis
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.othermetabolic syndrome X
dc.subject.otherprocedures
dc.subject.otherquestionnaire
dc.subject.otherreceiver operating characteristic
dc.subject.otherreproducibility
dc.titleMetabolic syndrome index measurement tool (MSI): scale development, reliability and validity study
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.departmentNursing Department, Bayburt University Health Sciences Faculty, Bayburt, 69000, Turkey
rdl.departmentVocational School of Health Services, Medical Services and Techniques Department, First and Emergency Aid Programme, Bayburt University, Bayburt, 69000, Turkey
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12889-025-21304-7
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)