Utilization of Response Surface Methodology in Optimization of Proline Extraction from Castanea sativa Honey

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ2
  • SDG 2 · Açlığa Son

Özet

Proline constitutes approximately 85 % of the amino acid composition of honey. Therefore, the quantitative determination of this amino acid in honey samples is used by many national/international authorities to evaluate the quality of honey types. In this study, it was aimed to achieve maximum proline amino acid extraction from honey samples whose botanical origins were confirmed by melissopalynological analysis. For this reason, based on three different spectrophotometric methods used in the literature for proline analysis, proline extraction was optimized with the Response Surface Method (RSM) and Box-Behnken experimental design. Three independent variables were determined as treatment time (2, 6, and 10 min), treatment temperature (22, 46, and 70 °C), and cooling time (5, 25, and 45 min). As a result of the optimization, it was seen that only significantly effective independent variable on the proline content of honey was the processing temperature. The optimum conditions obtained as a result of the RSM were found to be 2 min for the treatment time, 70 °C for the treatment temperature and 45 min for the cooling time. The composite desirability of the optimum conditions (R2) was found to be 1.00. It was determined that the method proposed by International Honey Commission (IHC) is efficient for proline analysis, but it provides more proline extraction by reducing of time from 10 min to 2 min in hold time in boiling water bath only during the extraction step. As a result, the conditions to be used in order to achieve maximum proline extraction with different spectrophotometric methods were determined and optimum values were determined. In addition, since the botanical origin of honey samples significantly affects the proline content of honey, it can be suggested that this study be optimized for different monofloral honey samples as well.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11633Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202201092Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
7
WoS
4
OpenAlex
8
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorEcem Bayram, Nesrin
dc.contributor.authorKutlu, Naciye
dc.contributor.authorCan Gercek, Yusuf
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:08:37.186445003Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:08:37.186445003Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractProline constitutes approximately 85 % of the amino acid composition of honey. Therefore, the quantitative determination of this amino acid in honey samples is used by many national/international authorities to evaluate the quality of honey types. In this study, it was aimed to achieve maximum proline amino acid extraction from honey samples whose botanical origins were confirmed by melissopalynological analysis. For this reason, based on three different spectrophotometric methods used in the literature for proline analysis, proline extraction was optimized with the Response Surface Method (RSM) and Box-Behnken experimental design. Three independent variables were determined as treatment time (2, 6, and 10 min), treatment temperature (22, 46, and 70 °C), and cooling time (5, 25, and 45 min). As a result of the optimization, it was seen that only significantly effective independent variable on the proline content of honey was the processing temperature. The optimum conditions obtained as a result of the RSM were found to be 2 min for the treatment time, 70 °C for the treatment temperature and 45 min for the cooling time. The composite desirability of the optimum conditions (R2) was found to be 1.00. It was determined that the method proposed by International Honey Commission (IHC) is efficient for proline analysis, but it provides more proline extraction by reducing of time from 10 min to 2 min in hold time in boiling water bath only during the extraction step. As a result, the conditions to be used in order to achieve maximum proline extraction with different spectrophotometric methods were determined and optimum values were determined. In addition, since the botanical origin of honey samples significantly affects the proline content of honey, it can be suggested that this study be optimized for different monofloral honey samples as well.
dc.identifier.articlenumbere202201092
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cbdv.202201092
dc.identifier.eissn1612-1880
dc.identifier.issn1612-1872
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid36751954
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148050565
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11633
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000939174000001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.relation.ispartofChemistry and Biodiversity
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCastanea sativa
dc.subjectchestnut
dc.subjecthoney
dc.subjectoptimization
dc.subjectproline
dc.subject.classificationBiochemistry & Molecular Biology
dc.subject.classificationChemistry, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationChemistry
dc.subject.otherAmino Acids
dc.subject.otherFagaceae
dc.subject.otherHoney
dc.subject.otherProline
dc.subject.otherSpectrophotometry
dc.subject.otherTemperature
dc.subject.otheramino acid
dc.subject.otheramino acid composition
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherCastanea sativa
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherexperimental design
dc.subject.otherextraction
dc.subject.otherfloral honey
dc.subject.otherhoneydew honey
dc.subject.otherindependent variable
dc.subject.othernonhuman
dc.subject.otherpollen analysis
dc.subject.otherresponse surface method
dc.subject.otherspectroscopy
dc.subject.otherunifloral honey
dc.subject.otherchemistry
dc.subject.otherprocedures
dc.titleUtilization of Response Surface Methodology in Optimization of Proline Extraction from Castanea sativa Honey
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex8
rdl.citation.scopus7
rdl.citation.wos4
rdl.departmentDepartment of Food Processing, Aydintepe Vocational College, Bayburt University, 69500, Bayburt, Türkiye
rdl.departmentCenter for Plant and Herbal Products Research-Development, Istanbul University, 34134, Istanbul, Türkiye
rdl.departmentDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, 34116, Istanbul, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statusbronze
rdl.oa.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/cbdv.202201092
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.sdgSDG02
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)