The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the E-Learning Satisfaction Scale

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ4
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam
  • SDG 4 · Nitelikli Eğitim

Özet

Objective: With the widespread adoption of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and advances in internet technology, the need for a validated tool to assess student satisfaction has become increasingly important. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the e-Learning Satisfaction Scale (e-LSS). Methods: This cross-sectional, methodological study was conducted with 537 students enrolled in health sciences programs at Erzurum Atatürk University between November 2022 and February 2023. In this study, a non-probability sampling method was used by selecting units that met specific criteria. Content validity was evaluated by expert review of the scale items. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability and stability of the scale were tested using the equivalent (parallel) forms method. Results: EFA results showed a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.94 and a significant Bartlett’s test result (χ² = 126.773, p<.001), indicating sample adequacy. Factor loadings ranged from .825 to .354 for the “Content” subscale, .859 to .571 for “Interface,” and .802 to .654 for “Communication.” CFA demonstrated acceptable model fit indices: χ²/df = 4.332, TLI = .915, RMSEA = .079, SRMR = .0481, AGFI = .857, GFI = .896, IFI = .931, and CFI = .930. The final scale consisted of 17 items across 3 subscales. Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.86, 0.86, and 0.83 for the subscales, and 0.93 for the overall scale. Conclusion: The scale was found to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring e-learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/10982Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1717382Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
OpenAlex
0
TR Dizin
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKaraman Özlü, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorGünaydinli, Azime
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Merve
dc.contributor.authorUçan, İzzet
dc.contributor.authorTaşgin, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorÖzlü, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorKüçükoğlu, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorSaraçoğlu, Ayhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:07:56.261919852Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:07:56.261919852Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractObjective: With the widespread adoption of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and advances in internet technology, the need for a validated tool to assess student satisfaction has become increasingly important. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the e-Learning Satisfaction Scale (e-LSS). Methods: This cross-sectional, methodological study was conducted with 537 students enrolled in health sciences programs at Erzurum Atatürk University between November 2022 and February 2023. In this study, a non-probability sampling method was used by selecting units that met specific criteria. Content validity was evaluated by expert review of the scale items. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability and stability of the scale were tested using the equivalent (parallel) forms method. Results: EFA results showed a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.94 and a significant Bartlett’s test result (χ² = 126.773, p<.001), indicating sample adequacy. Factor loadings ranged from .825 to .354 for the “Content” subscale, .859 to .571 for “Interface,” and .802 to .654 for “Communication.” CFA demonstrated acceptable model fit indices: χ²/df = 4.332, TLI = .915, RMSEA = .079, SRMR = .0481, AGFI = .857, GFI = .896, IFI = .931, and CFI = .930. The final scale consisted of 17 items across 3 subscales. Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.86, 0.86, and 0.83 for the subscales, and 0.93 for the overall scale. Conclusion: The scale was found to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring e-learning.
dc.identifier.doi10.62425/esbder.1717382
dc.identifier.eissn2687-2110
dc.identifier.endpage54
dc.identifier.issn2687-2110
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105036820848
dc.identifier.startpage46
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/10982
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAtaturk Universitesi
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Midwifery and Health Sciences
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectE-Learning
dc.subjectFactor Analysis
dc.subjectHealth Sciences Students
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subjectScale Adaptation
dc.subjectTurkish Version
dc.subjectValidity and Reliability
dc.titleThe Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the E-Learning Satisfaction Scale
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1717382
rdl.scopus.quartileQ4
rdl.sdgSDG04
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN