Nurses’ Ethical Reasoning About Digital Ethical Risks: A Vignette-Elicited Qualitative Study

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Aim: This qualitative study aimed to explore how nurses reason ethically about potential digital ethical risks arising from the routine use of digital systems in clinical practice and the strategies they propose to address these risks in response to vignette-based scenarios. Background: Digital systems shape nursing documentation, monitoring, communication, education, and decision-making. Although they support care, digital ethical risks may arise when digital outputs are accepted without clinical verification, patients are not adequately informed, or data protection is weak. Design: A vignette-elicited qualitative design was used. Methods: The study was conducted in September 2025 with 16 nurses working in three public hospitals in Central Anatolia, Türkiye. Data were generated through face-to-face interviews using seven vignette-based scenarios and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes were generated through the analysis of nurses’ ethical reasoning in response to the vignette-based scenarios: (i) nurses’ purposes for using digital systems, (ii) digital ethical risks in nursing, and (iii) strategies to prevent digital ethical risks. The findings within Themes 2 and 3 were organized into four subthemes—nonmaleficence and beneficence, autonomy and respect for persons, justice and equity, privacy and confidentiality—and further structured across three researcher-developed categories: nurse, digital system, and organization. Conclusions: Participants’ interpretations of the vignette-based scenarios highlighted potential digital ethical risks that may require nurses to combine clinical judgment with ethical reasoning when using digital systems. Implications for Nursing: Participants’ responses may inform digital ethics education by highlighting the importance of verifying digital data through bedside assessment, questioning potentially unsafe digital outputs, protecting confidentiality, obtaining meaningful consent, and recognizing potential risks in documentation, alarms, communication, and data sharing. Implications for Health Policy: Participant-identified priorities may inform institutional consideration of protocols for documentation, alarm management, mobile communication, image sharing, access control, patient information, accessibility, and accountability in digital nursing care.

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11028Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70224Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorBal, Betül
dc.contributor.authorKöroğlu Kaba, Nagihan
dc.contributor.authorApaydin, Emine
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:07:58.936435886Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:07:58.936435886Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAim: This qualitative study aimed to explore how nurses reason ethically about potential digital ethical risks arising from the routine use of digital systems in clinical practice and the strategies they propose to address these risks in response to vignette-based scenarios. Background: Digital systems shape nursing documentation, monitoring, communication, education, and decision-making. Although they support care, digital ethical risks may arise when digital outputs are accepted without clinical verification, patients are not adequately informed, or data protection is weak. Design: A vignette-elicited qualitative design was used. Methods: The study was conducted in September 2025 with 16 nurses working in three public hospitals in Central Anatolia, Türkiye. Data were generated through face-to-face interviews using seven vignette-based scenarios and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes were generated through the analysis of nurses’ ethical reasoning in response to the vignette-based scenarios: (i) nurses’ purposes for using digital systems, (ii) digital ethical risks in nursing, and (iii) strategies to prevent digital ethical risks. The findings within Themes 2 and 3 were organized into four subthemes—nonmaleficence and beneficence, autonomy and respect for persons, justice and equity, privacy and confidentiality—and further structured across three researcher-developed categories: nurse, digital system, and organization. Conclusions: Participants’ interpretations of the vignette-based scenarios highlighted potential digital ethical risks that may require nurses to combine clinical judgment with ethical reasoning when using digital systems. Implications for Nursing: Participants’ responses may inform digital ethics education by highlighting the importance of verifying digital data through bedside assessment, questioning potentially unsafe digital outputs, protecting confidentiality, obtaining meaningful consent, and recognizing potential risks in documentation, alarms, communication, and data sharing. Implications for Health Policy: Participant-identified priorities may inform institutional consideration of protocols for documentation, alarm management, mobile communication, image sharing, access control, patient information, accessibility, and accountability in digital nursing care.
dc.identifier.articlenumbere70224
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/inr.70224
dc.identifier.issn0020-8132
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13520951
dc.identifier.pmid42658103
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105048734939
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11028
dc.identifier.volume73
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Nursing Review
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject.otherConfidentiality
dc.subject.otherDigital Health
dc.subject.otherDigital Media
dc.subject.otherEthics, Nursing
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMiddle Aged
dc.subject.otherNursing Staff, Hospital
dc.subject.otherQualitative Research
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherarticle
dc.subject.otherbeneficence
dc.subject.otherclinical practice
dc.subject.otherdecision making
dc.subject.otherface-to-face interview
dc.subject.otherhealth care policy
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherInternational Council of Nurses
dc.subject.otherinternational nursing
dc.subject.othernonmaleficence
dc.subject.othernurse
dc.subject.othernursing care
dc.subject.otherpatient information
dc.subject.otherprivacy
dc.subject.otherpublic hospital
dc.subject.otherreasoning
dc.subject.otherthematic analysis
dc.subject.othervignette
dc.subject.otherethics
dc.subject.otherhealth personnel attitude
dc.subject.othermedical ethics
dc.subject.othernursing staff
dc.subject.otherpsychology
dc.subject.otherturkey (bird)
dc.titleNurses’ Ethical Reasoning About Digital Ethical Risks: A Vignette-Elicited Qualitative Study
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.departmentNursing Department, Akdağmadeni School of Health, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye
rdl.departmentManagement and Organization Department, Vocational School of Health Services, Bayburt University, Bayburt, Türkiye
rdl.departmentMedical Services and Techniques Department, Vocational School of Health Services, Bayburt University, Bayburt, Turkiye
rdl.oa.statushybrid
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/inr.70224
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED