Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları

• 2
• 1
• 1

Yazarlar

• Kaya, Metin(2)
• Erdem, Cahit(1)
• Selvitopu, Abdullah(1)

• Derleme MakaleAçık Erişim2023Scopus SJRQ2/r/bayburt/11667
  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Academic Performance

  Selvitopu, Abdullah; Kaya, Metin

  The two main purposes of the current meta-analysis were (a) to determine the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) of students and academic performance (AP) (b) and evaluate the effect of several potential moderating factors in this relation. Data covered the publications between 2010 and 2019, and the dataset consisted of 48 independent studies that included 62 different samples, and the total sample was 386.601. Findings revealed that the relation between SES and academic performance represented a moderate positive correlation. All moderators, type of SES measure, academic performance scale, location, grade level, subjects of academic performance, and year, produced significant effects, respectively. These findings were discussed for every category of moderators with the related literature.

  • 
  • 
  AtıfScopus65·WoS54·OpenAlex81

  İncele
• MakaleYalnız künye2021Scopus SJRQ1/r/bayburt/11963
  Students’ Well-Being and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study

  Kaya, Metin; Erdem, Cahit

  A considerable amount of literature has been published on students’ well-being, but empirical research has yielded ambiguous results regarding the relationship between well-being and academic achievement. Meta-analysis studies on this issue are scarce, and the available studies focus on a single domain of well-being. Meta-analyses investigating students’ general well-being and academic achievement are needed. To this end, we carried out a meta-analysis study on the association between students’ general well-being and academic achievement based on data from correlational studies involving 54,426 participants in 81 independent samples. We report a significant and positive but small effect size based on this dataset. The effect sizes differ significantly in terms of the moderator variables of publication year, age, school level, and publication type, while the correlation is robust across well-being domains, academic areas, scale types, and development levels of countries. Results are discussed and implications are suggested in line with the literature.

  • 
  • 
  AtıfScopus200·WoS158·OpenAlex225

  İncele