Evaluation of four different cogeneration cycles by using some criteria

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ3
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

The purpose of this article is to evaluate four different gas turbine cogeneration cycles which are basic, absorption cooling, air heating and air fuel heating cogeneration cycles by using the most important six evaluation criteria for different excess air coefficient, different compression rates, and different compressor inlet air temperatures. These six evaluation criteria are electrical heat ratio, exergy efficiency, incremental heat rate, artificial thermal efficiency, fuel energy saving ratio, and specific fuel consumption. It is seen that the air-fuel heating cogeneration cycle is the most efficient among the cycles examined for a certain compressor compression ratio, followed by the air heating, basic, and absorption cooling cycles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13429Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0128Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
20
WoS
18
OpenAlex
30
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKaraali, Rabi
dc.contributor.authorKeven, Arzu
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:10:56.982337586Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:10:56.982337586Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to evaluate four different gas turbine cogeneration cycles which are basic, absorption cooling, air heating and air fuel heating cogeneration cycles by using the most important six evaluation criteria for different excess air coefficient, different compression rates, and different compressor inlet air temperatures. These six evaluation criteria are electrical heat ratio, exergy efficiency, incremental heat rate, artificial thermal efficiency, fuel energy saving ratio, and specific fuel consumption. It is seen that the air-fuel heating cogeneration cycle is the most efficient among the cycles examined for a certain compressor compression ratio, followed by the air heating, basic, and absorption cooling cycles.
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/arh-2022-0128
dc.identifier.eissn1617-8106
dc.identifier.endpage137
dc.identifier.issn1430-6395
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141078457
dc.identifier.startpage122
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13429
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000869880600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Rheology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcogeneration
dc.subjectevaluation criteria
dc.subjectexergy
dc.subject.classificationMechanics
dc.subject.otherOPTIMIZATION
dc.titleEvaluation of four different cogeneration cycles by using some criteria
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex30
rdl.citation.scopus20
rdl.citation.wos18
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/arh-2022-0128/pdf
rdl.scopus.quartileQ3
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)