Sustainability Ranking of Turkish Universities with Different Weighting Approaches and the TOPSIS Method

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 12 · Sorumlu Üretim ve Tüketim
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

The concept of sustainability has become more important, especially as a result of the depletion of energy resources and increasing environmental concerns. UI GreenMetric ranks universities based on sustainability, environmental, and energy concerns, addressing issues of environmental pollution, food and water scarcity, and energy supply. By prioritizing sustainability on their campuses and campuses, universities are working to ensure a more sustainable future for humanity. This study evaluates university sustainability in energy and climate change using the UI GreenMetric ranking, focusing on Turkish universities’ sustainability ranking. It incorporates variables like infrastructure, energy, climate change, waste, water, public transportation, and educational research, using weighting approaches to reveal the most important variables for the country’s universities. The study utilized weighting techniques like CRITIC, entropy, standard deviation-based, and equal weighting approaches to obtain rankings for UI GreenMetric rankings. Entropy and equal weighting methods were found to be closest to the UI GreenMetric rankings. Universities’ rankings were analyzed using the TOPSIS method and four weighting techniques for 83 Turkish universities. For Turkish universities, the CRITIC method yielded the highest weight for energy and climate change variables, while water was identified as the most significant factor for entropy, installation infrastructure, and standard deviation-based weighting techniques.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11853Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612234Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
13
WoS
11
OpenAlex
15
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAkyol Özcan, Kübra
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:08:52.928135759Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:08:52.928135759Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThe concept of sustainability has become more important, especially as a result of the depletion of energy resources and increasing environmental concerns. UI GreenMetric ranks universities based on sustainability, environmental, and energy concerns, addressing issues of environmental pollution, food and water scarcity, and energy supply. By prioritizing sustainability on their campuses and campuses, universities are working to ensure a more sustainable future for humanity. This study evaluates university sustainability in energy and climate change using the UI GreenMetric ranking, focusing on Turkish universities’ sustainability ranking. It incorporates variables like infrastructure, energy, climate change, waste, water, public transportation, and educational research, using weighting approaches to reveal the most important variables for the country’s universities. The study utilized weighting techniques like CRITIC, entropy, standard deviation-based, and equal weighting approaches to obtain rankings for UI GreenMetric rankings. Entropy and equal weighting methods were found to be closest to the UI GreenMetric rankings. Universities’ rankings were analyzed using the TOPSIS method and four weighting techniques for 83 Turkish universities. For Turkish universities, the CRITIC method yielded the highest weight for energy and climate change variables, while water was identified as the most significant factor for entropy, installation infrastructure, and standard deviation-based weighting techniques.
dc.identifier.articlenumber12234
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su151612234
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue16
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169110447
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11853
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001056822000001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability (Switzerland)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectsustainability in higher education
dc.subjectUI GreenMetric
dc.subjectuniversity ranking
dc.subjectweighting methods
dc.subject.classificationGreen & Sustainable Science & Technology
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Studies
dc.subject.classificationScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherclimate change
dc.subject.otherenergy efficiency
dc.subject.otherhigher education
dc.subject.otherinstallation
dc.subject.otherranking
dc.subject.othersustainability
dc.subject.otheruniversity sector
dc.titleSustainability Ranking of Turkish Universities with Different Weighting Approaches and the TOPSIS Method
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex15
rdl.citation.scopus13
rdl.citation.wos11
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12234/pdf?version=1691669140
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.sdgSDG12
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)