Does Climate Change Vulnerability Cause Energy Vulnerability in Sustainable Development?

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji
  • SDG 9 · Sanayi, Yenilikçilik ve Altyapı
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

Climate change and energy security are two fundamental vulnerability areas that interact with each other and hold critical importance for sustainable development goals. This research aims to fill the research gap by investigating the effects of climate change vulnerability (CCV) on the energy vulnerability (EV) relationship, which has not been adequately addressed in the literature, using a large panel dataset covering 74 countries and employing various methodological approaches (MMQR, PLFC, DID). The results of the MMQR model indicate that CCV increases EV across all quantiles. According to the results of the PLFC model, it is revealed that CCV on EV varies depending on the economic development level of countries. This effect is higher in low-income countries. The study also employs the DID model to examine the impact of China's foreign energy investments on countries' EV. According to this model, China's fossil-based energy investments, particularly those in the energy sector, increase the EV of countries. While economic development reduces EV across all quantiles, financial development reduces it in the lower and medium quantiles (25% and 50%); urbanization reduces it in the medium and higher quantiles (50% and 75%). All results show that the interaction between EV and CCV is a multidimensional and dynamic process. Accordingly, policymakers should develop integrated strategies that consider environment and energy policies, economic development, investment type, and environmental risks. Lastly, policymakers should consider energy investments from China not only as a tool for their country's economic growth, but also in terms of energy security and sustainability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/10820Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70390Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
22
WoS
22
OpenAlex
23
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Cem
dc.contributor.authorOngan, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorKuziboev, Bekhzod
dc.contributor.authorImamoglu, Ilyas Kays
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T17:19:32.056328533Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T17:19:32.056328533Z
dc.date.issued2026-03
dc.description.abstractClimate change and energy security are two fundamental vulnerability areas that interact with each other and hold critical importance for sustainable development goals. This research aims to fill the research gap by investigating the effects of climate change vulnerability (CCV) on the energy vulnerability (EV) relationship, which has not been adequately addressed in the literature, using a large panel dataset covering 74 countries and employing various methodological approaches (MMQR, PLFC, DID). The results of the MMQR model indicate that CCV increases EV across all quantiles. According to the results of the PLFC model, it is revealed that CCV on EV varies depending on the economic development level of countries. This effect is higher in low-income countries. The study also employs the DID model to examine the impact of China's foreign energy investments on countries' EV. According to this model, China's fossil-based energy investments, particularly those in the energy sector, increase the EV of countries. While economic development reduces EV across all quantiles, financial development reduces it in the lower and medium quantiles (25% and 50%); urbanization reduces it in the medium and higher quantiles (50% and 75%). All results show that the interaction between EV and CCV is a multidimensional and dynamic process. Accordingly, policymakers should develop integrated strategies that consider environment and energy policies, economic development, investment type, and environmental risks. Lastly, policymakers should consider energy investments from China not only as a tool for their country's economic growth, but also in terms of energy security and sustainability.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sd.70390
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1719
dc.identifier.endpage1181
dc.identifier.issn0968-0802
dc.identifier.issueS2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105021217522
dc.identifier.startpage1170
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/10820
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001607540500001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDID
dc.subjectMMQR
dc.subjectPLFC
dc.subjectSustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
dc.subjectSustainablity
dc.subject.classificationDevelopment Studies
dc.subject.classificationGreen & Sustainable Science & Technology
dc.subject.classificationRegional & Urban Planning
dc.subject.classificationScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subject.classificationPublic Administration
dc.subject.otherPANEL-DATA MODELS
dc.subject.otherPOLICY UNCERTAINTY
dc.titleDoes Climate Change Vulnerability Cause Energy Vulnerability in Sustainable Development?
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex23
rdl.citation.scopus22
rdl.citation.wos22
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/5914
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.sdgSDG09
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)