Municipal solid waste-based district heating and electricity production: A case study
Özet
In this paper, municipal solid waste (MSW) based electricity production and district heating (DH) potential of Turkey are considered. Three MSW based waste-to-energy (WtE) scenarios is developed: (i) Scenario-I, a DH system integrated into a gas turbine power plant (GTPP), (ii) Scenario-II, a DH system integrated into an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and (iii) Scenario-III, which is based solely on a DH system. As a result of the thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyzes of these developed scenarios using an existing MSW-based cogeneration facility's actual operating data, the system with the most extended payback period (about 5 years) is found as the GTPP-DH system developed in Scenario-I, which also has the highest investment cost. On the other hand, the system with the shortest payback period (about 2 years) is found as the DH system developed in Scenario-III, which also has the lowest investment cost. Overall exergy efficiencies of the GTTP-DH, ORC-DH, and DH systems are found to be 41.86%, 16.15%, and 31.87%, respectively. When the developed WtE scenarios adapted to the pilot provinces selected from each geographical region of Turkey, it is found that the GTPP system developed in Scenario-I can increase the power generation capacity of MSW plants for each province by about 20%.
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Scopus
- 16
- WoS
- 15
- OpenAlex
- 16
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tozlu, Alperen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abusoglu, Aysegul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozahi, Emrah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-29T19:09:05.603275004Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-29T19:09:05.603275004Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, municipal solid waste (MSW) based electricity production and district heating (DH) potential of Turkey are considered. Three MSW based waste-to-energy (WtE) scenarios is developed: (i) Scenario-I, a DH system integrated into a gas turbine power plant (GTPP), (ii) Scenario-II, a DH system integrated into an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and (iii) Scenario-III, which is based solely on a DH system. As a result of the thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyzes of these developed scenarios using an existing MSW-based cogeneration facility's actual operating data, the system with the most extended payback period (about 5 years) is found as the GTPP-DH system developed in Scenario-I, which also has the highest investment cost. On the other hand, the system with the shortest payback period (about 2 years) is found as the DH system developed in Scenario-III, which also has the lowest investment cost. Overall exergy efficiencies of the GTTP-DH, ORC-DH, and DH systems are found to be 41.86%, 16.15%, and 31.87%, respectively. When the developed WtE scenarios adapted to the pilot provinces selected from each geographical region of Turkey, it is found that the GTPP system developed in Scenario-I can increase the power generation capacity of MSW plants for each province by about 20%. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Danida Fellowship Centre, DFC | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Aalborg Universitet, AAU | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Udenrigsministeriet, (18-M06) | |
| dc.identifier.articlenumber | 126495 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126495 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-1786 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85102612910 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/12024 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 297 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000659113300002 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Cleaner Production | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | District heating | |
| dc.subject | Municipal solid waste | |
| dc.subject | Power production | |
| dc.subject | Thermodynamic | |
| dc.subject | Thermoeconomic | |
| dc.subject.classification | Green & Sustainable Science & Technology | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering, Environmental | |
| dc.subject.classification | Environmental Sciences | |
| dc.subject.classification | Science & Technology - Other Topics | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering | |
| dc.subject.classification | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | |
| dc.subject.other | Costs | |
| dc.subject.other | District heating | |
| dc.subject.other | Electric power generation | |
| dc.subject.other | Gas turbines | |
| dc.subject.other | Investments | |
| dc.subject.other | Rankine cycle | |
| dc.subject.other | District heating system | |
| dc.subject.other | Electricity production | |
| dc.subject.other | Energy scenarios | |
| dc.subject.other | Gas turbines power plants | |
| dc.subject.other | Organics | |
| dc.subject.other | Payback periods | |
| dc.subject.other | Power production | |
| dc.subject.other | Rankine | |
| dc.subject.other | Thermoeconomic | |
| dc.subject.other | Waste to energy | |
| dc.subject.other | Municipal solid waste | |
| dc.title | Municipal solid waste-based district heating and electricity production: A case study | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| rdl.citation.openalex | 16 | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 16 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 15 | |
| rdl.oa.status | green | |
| rdl.oa.status | preprint | |
| rdl.oa.url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/3510 | |
| rdl.scopus.quartile | Q1 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG07 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG09 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG12 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG13 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG11 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |





