Exergetic Comparison of Single and Double Effect Absorption Cooling Cycles

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

Absorption cooling cycles are environmental and can use solar or waste heat for cooling with very small electric power. This workpresents exergy analysis of a double effect parallel flow and single effect absorption cooling systems for comparison. A computerprogram is developed for the thermodynamic properties of lithium bromide-water solutions by the author in FORTRAN codes forthe exergy analysis. The double effect parallel flow absorption systems have better advantages than the single effect absorption system.The coefficient performance (COP) and the exergetic coefficient performance (ECOP) of the double effect parallel flow absorptionsystems are higher than the single cycles. For the double effect cycle COP and ECOP are found as 1.195 and 0.28, and for the singleeffect cycle COP and ECOP are found as 0.68 and 0.23, respectively. For each component the exergy loss and exergy destruction iscalculated. Most of the irreversibilities are found in the evaporator and in the absorber which about 74 % for the double effect, and 72% for the single effect of the total irreversibility. It is concluded that the performance of the evaporator and the absorber is crucial forthe two cycles. Improving and better design of these two components will directly improve and affect positively the working conditionsand the performance of the cycles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/15317Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7212/zkufbd.v1i1.556Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
OpenAlex
0
TR Dizin
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKaraali, Rabi
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:20:20.194570863Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:20:20.194570863Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAbsorption cooling cycles are environmental and can use solar or waste heat for cooling with very small electric power. This workpresents exergy analysis of a double effect parallel flow and single effect absorption cooling systems for comparison. A computerprogram is developed for the thermodynamic properties of lithium bromide-water solutions by the author in FORTRAN codes forthe exergy analysis. The double effect parallel flow absorption systems have better advantages than the single effect absorption system.The coefficient performance (COP) and the exergetic coefficient performance (ECOP) of the double effect parallel flow absorptionsystems are higher than the single cycles. For the double effect cycle COP and ECOP are found as 1.195 and 0.28, and for the singleeffect cycle COP and ECOP are found as 0.68 and 0.23, respectively. For each component the exergy loss and exergy destruction iscalculated. Most of the irreversibilities are found in the evaporator and in the absorber which about 74 % for the double effect, and 72% for the single effect of the total irreversibility. It is concluded that the performance of the evaporator and the absorber is crucial forthe two cycles. Improving and better design of these two components will directly improve and affect positively the working conditionsand the performance of the cycles.
dc.identifier.doi10.7212/zkufbd.v1i1.556
dc.identifier.eissn2146-7277
dc.identifier.endpage128
dc.identifier.issn2146-4987
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage122
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/15317
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofKaraelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMühendislik, Makine
dc.subjectTermodinamik
dc.subjectFizikokimya
dc.titleExergetic Comparison of Single and Double Effect Absorption Cooling Cycles
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/4356
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN