Development of teacher academic optimism scale: The validity and reliability study

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ4

Özet

The study aims to develop a valid and reliable academic optimism scale that can be used to determine teachers' academic optimism levels. The study was conducted through a total number of 404 primary school teachers who worked in the central districts of Malatya Province during 2014-2015 academic year. The content validity and face validity of the scale were determined via expert recommendations. An explanatory factor analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to determine the construct validity of the scale. After the expert opinions, 80 items reduced to 64 and the data was collected by the use of these 64 items. An exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 factors reducing 64 items in to 33 and explaining 58.56% of the total variation in the data. The five-factor model obtained through an explanatory factor analysis after removal of one item as a result of the confirmatory factor analysis was observed to be highly consistent. Different from previous related research, the result showed that a new dimension as "Maneger Trust" emerged as a part of "Teacher Academic Optimism Scale". And finally this scale could be used as a valid and reliable instrument in the future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13875Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2018.004Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
2
WoS
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorErgen, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorElma, Cevat
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:11:34.808483594Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:11:34.808483594Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe study aims to develop a valid and reliable academic optimism scale that can be used to determine teachers' academic optimism levels. The study was conducted through a total number of 404 primary school teachers who worked in the central districts of Malatya Province during 2014-2015 academic year. The content validity and face validity of the scale were determined via expert recommendations. An explanatory factor analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to determine the construct validity of the scale. After the expert opinions, 80 items reduced to 64 and the data was collected by the use of these 64 items. An exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 factors reducing 64 items in to 33 and explaining 58.56% of the total variation in the data. The five-factor model obtained through an explanatory factor analysis after removal of one item as a result of the confirmatory factor analysis was observed to be highly consistent. Different from previous related research, the result showed that a new dimension as "Maneger Trust" emerged as a part of "Teacher Academic Optimism Scale". And finally this scale could be used as a valid and reliable instrument in the future studies.
dc.identifier.doi10.14527/pegegog.2018.004
dc.identifier.endpage90
dc.identifier.issn2146-0655
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85038007738
dc.identifier.startpage69
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13875
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000431831600005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPegem Akademi Yayincilik Egitim Danismanlik Hizmetleri
dc.relation.ispartofPegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAcademic optimism
dc.subjectScale development
dc.subjectTeacher
dc.subject.classificationEducation & Educational Research
dc.subject.otherACHIEVEMENT
dc.subject.otherLEADERSHIP
dc.subject.otherSCHOOLS
dc.titleDevelopment of teacher academic optimism scale: The validity and reliability study
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.14527/10.14527/pegegog.2018.004
rdl.scopus.quartileQ4
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)