Looking inside the strategic plans: Strengths and weaknesses of Turkish higher education institutions; [Mirando dentro de los planes estratégicos: Fortalezas y debilidades de las instituciones de educación superior Turcas]

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ2
  • SDG 4 · Nitelikli Eğitim

Özet

As strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13499Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.4111Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
3
WoS
1
OpenAlex
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSelvitopu, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Metin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:11:03.547490728Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:11:03.547490728Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAs strengths and weaknesses are regarded as internal features of an organization, the present study focused on strengths and weaknesses of Turkish public universities by analyzing the SWOTs (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) of twenty higher education institutions. By applying qualitative content analytical tools, we tried to make some comparisons, twenty universities, ten ranked at the top and ten at the bottom of the URAP list, were chosen to analyze the strengths and weaknesses. Findings show that all universities top or bottom ones have internal strengths and weaknesses on their own. The strengths of universities differ according to their size, field of service, structure, history and geographical locations. Top universities which are in big size, have a deeply rooted history and situated in a better geographical location can enjoy the strengths as qualified faculty members, organizational culture, internationalization process, infrastructure and good alumni relations. On the other hand, bottom universities which have not got those advantages deal with other strengths such as young faculty members, organizational support and internal communication. As for the weaknesses, top universities need more budget and acceptable rate of faculty member and student. Bottom ones need more qualified faculty members, students and staff. As they are located in disadvantageous regions, they are in need of some promotions to attract faculties, staff, national and international students. In addition, they also should be aware of the contributions of good alumni relations.
dc.identifier.doi10.17583/qre.2020.4111
dc.identifier.endpage64
dc.identifier.issn2014-6418
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85081240798
dc.identifier.startpage32
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13499
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000518401200002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHipatia Press
dc.relation.ispartofQualitative Research in Education
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectStrengths
dc.subjectSWOT analysis
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectUniversity
dc.subjectWeaknesses
dc.subject.classificationEducation & Educational Research
dc.subject.otherINTERNATIONAL STUDENTS
dc.subject.otherABROAD DESTINATION
dc.subject.otherUNIVERSITY
dc.subject.otherFACULTY
dc.subject.otherEXPERIENCES
dc.subject.otherMANAGEMENT
dc.subject.otherCONFLICT
dc.subject.otherCHOOSE
dc.titleLooking inside the strategic plans: Strengths and weaknesses of Turkish higher education institutions; [Mirando dentro de los planes estratégicos: Fortalezas y debilidades de las instituciones de educación superior Turcas]
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus3
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/download/4111/3035
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.sdgSDG04
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)