Brand portfolio strategies effects on consumers' attitude

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ2

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of brand components (CBBE, brand fit, brand image, brand reputation, brand familiarity) on consumers brand portfolio attitude via perceived risk (for two main portfolio strategies). Design/methodology/approach: The study used a structured questionnaire to collect primary data from 636 consumers who made purchases from companies using house of brand (318) and branded house strategy (318). By conducting reliability and validity analysis, the model of this study was tested with confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis methods, using structural equation modeling. Findings: According to the results of the path analysis, the effects of CBBE and brand reputation on brand attitude were confirmed for both house of brand and branded house strategy. Moreover, the full and partial mediating effect of perceived risk was proven in the relationships. Research limitations/implications: One of the limitations of the study is determining a portfolio of brands for each strategy and collecting data for these brands. In addition, since the number of consumers using brand portfolios could not be reached in the study, data could be collected using the purposeful convenience sampling method. For this reason, it is thought that research conducted with the data obtained through systematic sampling methods can yield more reliable results. Practical implications: Managers of companies with a brand portfolio should work on a main strategy that enhances CBBE and brand reputation regardless of the strategy they use. After these two variables, the variable that portfolio managers need to address is brand fit. Originality/value: It will offer different perspectives in terms of understanding which portfolio strategy is needed, and which predecessors and outputs can be produced. Also, the findings of the research will produce important results to reduce the perceived risks of consumers and increase their positive attitudes toward brand portfolios.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13219Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-06-2021-0204Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
7
WoS
6
OpenAlex
8
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYilmazel, Sefa Emre
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, Leyla
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:10:39.628073191Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:10:39.628073191Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of brand components (CBBE, brand fit, brand image, brand reputation, brand familiarity) on consumers brand portfolio attitude via perceived risk (for two main portfolio strategies). Design/methodology/approach: The study used a structured questionnaire to collect primary data from 636 consumers who made purchases from companies using house of brand (318) and branded house strategy (318). By conducting reliability and validity analysis, the model of this study was tested with confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis methods, using structural equation modeling. Findings: According to the results of the path analysis, the effects of CBBE and brand reputation on brand attitude were confirmed for both house of brand and branded house strategy. Moreover, the full and partial mediating effect of perceived risk was proven in the relationships. Research limitations/implications: One of the limitations of the study is determining a portfolio of brands for each strategy and collecting data for these brands. In addition, since the number of consumers using brand portfolios could not be reached in the study, data could be collected using the purposeful convenience sampling method. For this reason, it is thought that research conducted with the data obtained through systematic sampling methods can yield more reliable results. Practical implications: Managers of companies with a brand portfolio should work on a main strategy that enhances CBBE and brand reputation regardless of the strategy they use. After these two variables, the variable that portfolio managers need to address is brand fit. Originality/value: It will offer different perspectives in terms of understanding which portfolio strategy is needed, and which predecessors and outputs can be produced. Also, the findings of the research will produce important results to reduce the perceived risks of consumers and increase their positive attitudes toward brand portfolios.
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/mip-06-2021-0204
dc.identifier.eissn1758-8049
dc.identifier.endpage152
dc.identifier.issn0263-4503
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120465507
dc.identifier.startpage138
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13219
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000728138800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Holdings Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofMarketing Intelligence and Planning
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBrand portfolio strategies
dc.subjectBranded house
dc.subjectHouse of brands
dc.subjectPerceived risk
dc.subjectSEM
dc.subject.classificationBusiness
dc.subject.classificationBusiness & Economics
dc.subject.otherCORPORATE IMAGE
dc.subject.otherEQUITY
dc.subject.otherIMPACT
dc.subject.otherRISK
dc.titleBrand portfolio strategies effects on consumers' attitude
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex8
rdl.citation.scopus7
rdl.citation.wos6
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)