Using solar greenhouses in cold climates and evaluating optimum type according to sizing, position and location: A case study

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 2 · Açlığa Son
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

This study deals with a comparison among five common greenhouse types with regard to total solar radiation gaining rates in greenhouse using season under some assumptions. Additionally, possibility of using greenhouses in cold climate regions is investigated. We analyzed five greenhouse types and developed a script in MATLAB platform for the solar radiation availability. This model is applicable and suitable for other buildings and places on the world. Even-span, uneven-span, vinery, semicircular and elliptic types of greenhouses have been analyzed. A "k" value (ratio of length to width of greenhouse) and greenhouse azimuth angle (GAA) are described. Seven different floor area are assigned for each greenhouse type such as 50m2, 100m2, 150m2, 200m2, 250m2, 300m2 and 400m2, respectively. For each floor area, k value is assigned from 1 to 10. Each greenhouse is oriented in 90 different angles according to south facade. Seasonal total solar energy gaining rates is computed individually for all possible greenhouse types, area, k number and orientation. Then a comprehensive comparison is made to determine the optimal greenhouse. The results show that greenhouses are usable and suitable for using in cold climate regions to increase the productivity. In addition, the elliptic type is the optimum one in all analyzed types of greenhouses for Bayburt conditions for all floor areas. It is followed by uneven-span, even-span, semi-circular and vinery type of greenhouses respectively. Shape and type of the roof are main effective parameters on solar energy gaining rates of greenhouses. Elliptic greenhouse should be preferred on the band of the latitude of Bayburt, unless there is restrictive factor like sizing and terrain.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/12302Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
93
WoS
77
OpenAlex
95
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÇakir, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:09:25.199671607Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:09:25.199671607Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThis study deals with a comparison among five common greenhouse types with regard to total solar radiation gaining rates in greenhouse using season under some assumptions. Additionally, possibility of using greenhouses in cold climate regions is investigated. We analyzed five greenhouse types and developed a script in MATLAB platform for the solar radiation availability. This model is applicable and suitable for other buildings and places on the world. Even-span, uneven-span, vinery, semicircular and elliptic types of greenhouses have been analyzed. A "k" value (ratio of length to width of greenhouse) and greenhouse azimuth angle (GAA) are described. Seven different floor area are assigned for each greenhouse type such as 50m2, 100m2, 150m2, 200m2, 250m2, 300m2 and 400m2, respectively. For each floor area, k value is assigned from 1 to 10. Each greenhouse is oriented in 90 different angles according to south facade. Seasonal total solar energy gaining rates is computed individually for all possible greenhouse types, area, k number and orientation. Then a comprehensive comparison is made to determine the optimal greenhouse. The results show that greenhouses are usable and suitable for using in cold climate regions to increase the productivity. In addition, the elliptic type is the optimum one in all analyzed types of greenhouses for Bayburt conditions for all floor areas. It is followed by uneven-span, even-span, semi-circular and vinery type of greenhouses respectively. Shape and type of the roof are main effective parameters on solar energy gaining rates of greenhouses. Elliptic greenhouse should be preferred on the band of the latitude of Bayburt, unless there is restrictive factor like sizing and terrain.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.005
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7107
dc.identifier.endpage257
dc.identifier.issn0168-1699
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84940039086
dc.identifier.startpage245
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/12302
dc.identifier.volume117
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000362135900024
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofComputers and Electronics in Agriculture
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectGreenhouse
dc.subjectGreenhouse design
dc.subjectGreenhouse shape
dc.subjectSolar energy
dc.subjectSolar radiation
dc.subjectSustainable agriculture
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationComputer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture
dc.subject.classificationComputer Science
dc.subject.otherBayburt
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherAgriculture
dc.subject.otherFloors
dc.subject.otherSolar energy
dc.subject.otherSolar radiation
dc.subject.otherComprehensive comparisons
dc.subject.otherDifferent floors
dc.subject.otherEffective parameters
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse design
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse shapes
dc.subject.otherRatio of length to widths
dc.subject.otherSolar greenhouse
dc.subject.otherSustainable agriculture
dc.subject.otheragricultural modeling
dc.subject.otheragricultural production
dc.subject.otheralternative agriculture
dc.subject.otherazimuth
dc.subject.otherclimatic region
dc.subject.otherexperimental design
dc.subject.othergreenhouse effect
dc.subject.othermodel validation
dc.subject.otherseasonal variation
dc.subject.othersoftware
dc.subject.othersolar power
dc.subject.otherspatial analysis
dc.subject.otherterrain
dc.subject.otherGreenhouses
dc.titleUsing solar greenhouses in cold climates and evaluating optimum type according to sizing, position and location: A case study
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex95
rdl.citation.scopus93
rdl.citation.wos77
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/683
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.sdgSDG02
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)