Optimization of extraction conditions of Micromeria fruticosa and use of optimized extract in beef patties production

MakaleYayıncıda açık erişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 2 · Açlığa Son

Özet

This study aimed to optimize the conditions for obtaining an ethanol extract from Micromeria fruticosa (M. fruticosa) and to determine the antioxidant activity and phenolic compound content of the resulting extract. Subsequently, the use of the optimized extract in beef patties was evaluated, and the effects of the cooking process on the physicochemical properties of the product were examined. In this context, the highest efficiency was obtained in terms of total phenolic contents (TPC), as well as DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) values, during the ethanol extraction of the plant. The optimum extraction conditions were determined to be 12 g of sample, 20 min, and 75% ultrasonic power. Under these conditions, the TPC of the extract was found to be 37.128 mg GAE/g dry weight, the DPPH value was 42.865, and the FRAP value was 254.776 mg TE/g dry weight. In the second phase of the study, the optimized extract was used at different concentrations (0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%) to produce beef patties, which were then analyzed for pH, moisture content, TBARS (thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances), and cooking yield. The use of the extract did not cause a statistically significant difference in the moisture content and TBARS values of the samples (p > 0.05). However, it was determined that the pH values of the samples containing 0% and 0.5% extract were lower than those containing 1.0% and 1.5% extract (p < 0.01). In addition, it was observed that the use of the extract had a positive effect on cooking yield, and that cooking yield increased with increasing extract concentration. As a result of the study, it was concluded that M. fruticosa holds promising potential as a natural additive in meat and meat products, offering a functional ingredient that can contribute to the development of value-added, health-oriented food products.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11122Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44463-026-00082-9Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAnlar Daldal, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorCinar Topcu, Kübra
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Özlem
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:08:04.255799255Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:08:04.255799255Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to optimize the conditions for obtaining an ethanol extract from Micromeria fruticosa (M. fruticosa) and to determine the antioxidant activity and phenolic compound content of the resulting extract. Subsequently, the use of the optimized extract in beef patties was evaluated, and the effects of the cooking process on the physicochemical properties of the product were examined. In this context, the highest efficiency was obtained in terms of total phenolic contents (TPC), as well as DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) values, during the ethanol extraction of the plant. The optimum extraction conditions were determined to be 12 g of sample, 20 min, and 75% ultrasonic power. Under these conditions, the TPC of the extract was found to be 37.128 mg GAE/g dry weight, the DPPH value was 42.865, and the FRAP value was 254.776 mg TE/g dry weight. In the second phase of the study, the optimized extract was used at different concentrations (0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%) to produce beef patties, which were then analyzed for pH, moisture content, TBARS (thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances), and cooking yield. The use of the extract did not cause a statistically significant difference in the moisture content and TBARS values of the samples (p > 0.05). However, it was determined that the pH values of the samples containing 0% and 0.5% extract were lower than those containing 1.0% and 1.5% extract (p < 0.01). In addition, it was observed that the use of the extract had a positive effect on cooking yield, and that cooking yield increased with increasing extract concentration. As a result of the study, it was concluded that M. fruticosa holds promising potential as a natural additive in meat and meat products, offering a functional ingredient that can contribute to the development of value-added, health-oriented food products.
dc.description.sponsorshipAtatürk Üniversitesi, (FKP-2024-13610)
dc.identifier.articlenumber81
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s44463-026-00082-9
dc.identifier.eissn2636-0780
dc.identifier.issn2636-0772
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13323460
dc.identifier.pmid42384298
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043433366
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11122
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001809435600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGERNATURE
dc.relation.ispartofFood Science of Animal Resources
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAntioxidant activity
dc.subjectCooking yield
dc.subjectMicromeria fruticosa
dc.subjectPatties
dc.subjectResponse surface methodology (RSM)
dc.subject.classificationFood Science & Technology
dc.subject.otherDRUCE SSP SERPYLLIFOLIA
dc.subject.otherWATER-HOLDING CAPACITY
dc.subject.otherLIPID OXIDATION
dc.subject.otherANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITIES
dc.subject.otherPHENOLIC CONTENT
dc.subject.otherLAMIACEAE
dc.subject.otherCOLOR
dc.subject.otherMEAT
dc.titleOptimization of extraction conditions of Micromeria fruticosa and use of optimized extract in beef patties production
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentAtatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
rdl.departmentBayburt University, Bayburt, Turkey
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG02
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)