Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları

• 2
• 1

• MakaleAçık Erişim2026Scopus SJRQ3/r/bayburt/11014
  Supportive Care Needs and Nursing Care Perceptions in Cancer Patients Receiving Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy: A Cross-Sectional Study

  Doğan, Nurhan; Tekinsoy Kartın, Pınar; Kalyoncuo, Servet

  Objective: This study was conducted to determine the supportive care needs of cancer patients undergoing targeted therapies and immunotherapy as well as their perceptions of nursing care. Methods: In this study, a cross-sectional research design, a quantitative research method, was used. The study was conducted with 210 individuals between 04.10.2021 and 28.02.2022. In the study, data were collected using the Individual Description Form, Supportive Care Needs Scale (SCNS-SF), and Patients’ Perception of Nursing Care Scale (PPNCS). Results: Individuals with a mean age of 59.18±12.53 years had a SCNS-SF mean score of 121.42±11.80, and a PPNCS mean score of 23.41±10.64. In the study, a significant difference was found between individuals' needs and care perceptions in terms of gender, educational level, cohabitants, working status and disease stage (P<.05). There is no significant correlation between the PPNCS total score and the SCNS-SF total score (r=-.03, P=.653). Conclusion: It was determined that the care needs of the individuals were moderate to high, and their perceptions of nursing care (degree of expected needs and patient satisfaction) were low.

  • 
  İncele
• MakaleYayıncıda açık erişim2024Scopus SJRQ4/r/bayburt/14155
  The Turkish Validity and Reliability of Clinical Reasoning Scale for Nursing Students: A Methodological Study

  Bal, Betul; Kaba, Nagihan Koroglu; Öztürk, Havva

  Objective: The aim of the study was to adapt the Clinical Reasoning Scale into Turkish and to evaluate its validity and reliability in nursing students. Methods: The study, which is methodological research, was conducted with 271 nursing students at a university in the Central Anatolia Region. The data were collected with the Personal Information Form and the 'Clinical Reasoning Scale' in its draft form. After the language and content validity of the scale, its construct validity was ensured by confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach Alpha, item -total correlations, divergent and test -retest methods were used for the reliability of the scale. Results: The fit indices of the Clinical Reasoning Scale for its 4 sub -dimensions, namely awareness of clinical clues, verification of clinical problems, identification and implementation of actions, evaluation and reflection, and a total of 16 items, are above 0.90, and according to these results, the structure of the scale is accepted as valid. The average explained variance of the subdimensions is between 0.476-0.579, and the composite reliability is between 0.778-0.854. The total Cronbach Alpha of the scale is 0.92. There is a significant difference between the top 27% and the bottom 27% groups of the scale and the test -retest correlation coefficient is 0.902. Conclusion: It has been determined that the Clinical Reasoning Scale is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to determine the level of clinical reasoning in nursing students with 16 items and 4 sub-dimensions.

  • 
  • 
  AtıfWoS4·OpenAlex2

  İncele