RETRACTED: Algorithmic management and reflexive ethnography: methodological innovations for practice-theoretical observation

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1

Özet

Purpose – This study aims to reveal the alternative methodological possibilities offered by reflexive ethnography in this field, where classical observation techniques are inadequate, by conducting a sociological analysis of algorithmic management systems that have become widespread on digital platforms. Design/methodology/approach – In the research conducted with reflexive ethnography, which is a qualitative method, the researcher’s own experience, position and impact on the observation process are placed at the center of data production. This approach offers a more flexible and multi-layered analysis framework in digital environments shaped by variables and algorithms that replace fixed observation areas. Findings – Algorithmic management constantly controls the workforce with opaque decision processes. This situation creates behavioral orientations that are difficult to capture with classical ethnography. Reflexive ethnography provides a more holistic observation by including the researcher’s intuitive, technical and experiential data in understanding these systems’ internal logic. Research limitations/implications – Reflexive ethnography offers a strong methodological basis that is flexible enough to not only understand today’s governance systems but also to analyze the digital institutions of the future. Originality/value – Regarding future ethnographic research, reflexive ethnography has the potential to address not only algorithmic systems but also the effects of these systems on users, performance evaluation methods and the construction of affect and self. The interdisciplinary collaborations of this method with informatics, media studies, sociology and anthropology will provide methodological depth and analytical diversity. Furthermore, combining with other approaches such as cyber-ethnography, shadow ethnography and autoethnography, it can open up new research paths to understand the multi-layered structure of digital platforms. Thus, reflexive ethnography offers a strong methodological basis that is flexible enough to not only understand today’s governance systems but also to analyze the digital institutions of the future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/10999Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/joe-06-2025-0088Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
1
WoS
1
OpenAlex
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorBattal, Fetullah
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:07:57.292235313Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:07:57.292235313Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPurpose – This study aims to reveal the alternative methodological possibilities offered by reflexive ethnography in this field, where classical observation techniques are inadequate, by conducting a sociological analysis of algorithmic management systems that have become widespread on digital platforms. Design/methodology/approach – In the research conducted with reflexive ethnography, which is a qualitative method, the researcher’s own experience, position and impact on the observation process are placed at the center of data production. This approach offers a more flexible and multi-layered analysis framework in digital environments shaped by variables and algorithms that replace fixed observation areas. Findings – Algorithmic management constantly controls the workforce with opaque decision processes. This situation creates behavioral orientations that are difficult to capture with classical ethnography. Reflexive ethnography provides a more holistic observation by including the researcher’s intuitive, technical and experiential data in understanding these systems’ internal logic. Research limitations/implications – Reflexive ethnography offers a strong methodological basis that is flexible enough to not only understand today’s governance systems but also to analyze the digital institutions of the future. Originality/value – Regarding future ethnographic research, reflexive ethnography has the potential to address not only algorithmic systems but also the effects of these systems on users, performance evaluation methods and the construction of affect and self. The interdisciplinary collaborations of this method with informatics, media studies, sociology and anthropology will provide methodological depth and analytical diversity. Furthermore, combining with other approaches such as cyber-ethnography, shadow ethnography and autoethnography, it can open up new research paths to understand the multi-layered structure of digital platforms. Thus, reflexive ethnography offers a strong methodological basis that is flexible enough to not only understand today’s governance systems but also to analyze the digital institutions of the future.
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/joe-06-2025-0088
dc.identifier.eissn2046-6757
dc.identifier.endpageXIV
dc.identifier.issn2046-6749
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105025151856
dc.identifier.startpageI
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/10999
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001630763200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Organizational Ethnography
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAlgorithmic management
dc.subjectDigital platforms
dc.subjectMethodological innovation
dc.subjectReflexive ethnography
dc.subject.classificationManagement
dc.subject.classificationBusiness & Economics
dc.titleRETRACTED: Algorithmic management and reflexive ethnography: methodological innovations for practice-theoretical observation
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/6058
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)