Does inquiry-based learning model improve learning outcomes? A second-order meta-analysis

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 4 · Nitelikli Eğitim

Özet

This research study aims to utilize a second-order meta-analysis procedure to synthesize the effects of inquiry-based learning model (IBLM) on learning outcomes. An extensive systematic review process resulted in the inclusion of 10 meta-analyses conducted between 2015 and 2022 with minimal overlap between primary studies. The results revealed that IBLM has a medium-level positive effect (d = 0.62) on learning outcomes. The analyses showed that mobile inquiry-based model, learning cycle model and conceptual change text model have high-level positive effect on learning outcomes. Moderator analyses revealed that the effect sizes were not significantly moderated by grade level, content area, location, quality, primary research report type, and publication bias. Limitations, educational implications, and directions for future research are provided.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13255Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202217481Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
33
OpenAlex
47
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Bilge
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Metin
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:10:42.289895669Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:10:42.289895669Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis research study aims to utilize a second-order meta-analysis procedure to synthesize the effects of inquiry-based learning model (IBLM) on learning outcomes. An extensive systematic review process resulted in the inclusion of 10 meta-analyses conducted between 2015 and 2022 with minimal overlap between primary studies. The results revealed that IBLM has a medium-level positive effect (d = 0.62) on learning outcomes. The analyses showed that mobile inquiry-based model, learning cycle model and conceptual change text model have high-level positive effect on learning outcomes. Moderator analyses revealed that the effect sizes were not significantly moderated by grade level, content area, location, quality, primary research report type, and publication bias. Limitations, educational implications, and directions for future research are provided.
dc.identifier.doi10.33902/jpr.202217481
dc.identifier.endpage216
dc.identifier.issn2602-3717
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139061425
dc.identifier.startpage201
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13255
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDuzce University, Faculty of Education
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pedagogical Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectInquiry-based learning model
dc.subjectLearning outcomes
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectSecond-order
dc.titleDoes inquiry-based learning model improve learning outcomes? A second-order meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex47
rdl.citation.scopus33
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.ijopr.com/download/does-inquiry-based-learning-model-improve-learning-outcomes-a-second-order-meta-analysis-12478.pdf
rdl.sdgSDG04
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS