Optimum design of steel frames against progressive collapse by guided simulated annealing algorithm

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ1

Özet

In this paper, a Guided Simulated Annealing (GSA) algorithm is presented to optimize 2D and 3D steel frames against Progressive Collapse. Considering the nature of structural optimization problems, a number of restrictions and improvements have been applied to the decision mechanisms of the algorithm without harming the randomness. With these improvements, the algorithm aims to focus relatively on the flawed variables of the analyzed frame. Besides that, it is intended to be more rational by instituting structural constraints on the sections to be selected as variables. In addition to the LRFD restrictions, the alternate path method with nonlinear dynamic procedure is used to assess the risk of progressive collapse, as specified in the US Department of Defense United Facilities Criteria (UFC) Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse. The entire optimization procedure was carried out on a C# software that supports parallel processing developed by the authors, and the frames were analyzed in SAP2000 using OAPI. Time history analyses of the removal scenarios are distributed to the processor cores in order to reduce computational time. The GSA produced 3% lighter structure weights than the SA (Simulated Annealing) and 4% lighter structure weights than the GA (Genetic Algorithm) for the 2D steel frame. For the 3D model, the GSA obtained 3% lighter results than the SA. Furthermore, it is clear that the UFC and LRFD requirements differ when the acceptance criteria are examined. It has been observed that the moment capacity of the entire frame is critical when designing according to UFC.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13006Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2024.50.5.583Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
5
WoS
5
OpenAlex
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTayfur, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorDaloğlu, Ayşe T.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:10:20.454086881Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:10:20.454086881Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, a Guided Simulated Annealing (GSA) algorithm is presented to optimize 2D and 3D steel frames against Progressive Collapse. Considering the nature of structural optimization problems, a number of restrictions and improvements have been applied to the decision mechanisms of the algorithm without harming the randomness. With these improvements, the algorithm aims to focus relatively on the flawed variables of the analyzed frame. Besides that, it is intended to be more rational by instituting structural constraints on the sections to be selected as variables. In addition to the LRFD restrictions, the alternate path method with nonlinear dynamic procedure is used to assess the risk of progressive collapse, as specified in the US Department of Defense United Facilities Criteria (UFC) Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse. The entire optimization procedure was carried out on a C# software that supports parallel processing developed by the authors, and the frames were analyzed in SAP2000 using OAPI. Time history analyses of the removal scenarios are distributed to the processor cores in order to reduce computational time. The GSA produced 3% lighter structure weights than the SA (Simulated Annealing) and 4% lighter structure weights than the GA (Genetic Algorithm) for the 2D steel frame. For the 3D model, the GSA obtained 3% lighter results than the SA. Furthermore, it is clear that the UFC and LRFD requirements differ when the acceptance criteria are examined. It has been observed that the moment capacity of the entire frame is critical when designing according to UFC.
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/scs.2024.50.5.583
dc.identifier.eissn1598-6233
dc.identifier.endpage594
dc.identifier.issn1229-9367
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188156849
dc.identifier.startpage583
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/13006
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001200782500002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechno-Press
dc.relation.ispartofSteel and Composite Structures
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectoptimization
dc.subjectprogressive collapse
dc.subjectsimulated annealing
dc.subjectsteel structures
dc.subject.classificationConstruction & Building Technology
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Civil
dc.subject.classificationMaterials Science, Composites
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.classificationMaterials Science
dc.subject.other3D modeling
dc.subject.otherGenetic algorithms
dc.subject.otherRisk assessment
dc.subject.otherShape optimization
dc.subject.otherSimulated annealing
dc.subject.otherSteel construction
dc.subject.otherSteel structures
dc.subject.otherStructural dynamics
dc.subject.otherStructural optimization
dc.subject.otherAlternate path method
dc.subject.otherAnnealing algorithm
dc.subject.otherDecision mechanism
dc.subject.otherNonlinear dynamic procedures
dc.subject.otherOptimisations
dc.subject.otherOptimum designs
dc.subject.otherProgressive collapse
dc.subject.otherSteel frame
dc.subject.otherStructural constraints
dc.subject.otherStructural optimization problems
dc.subject.otherStructural frames
dc.titleOptimum design of steel frames against progressive collapse by guided simulated annealing algorithm
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus5
rdl.citation.wos5
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)