Comparative thermal and hydraulic performance of Type-22 panel radiators under continuous and pulsating flow

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 7 · Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji

Özet

Pulsating water-side flow has been proposed as a radiator control strategy to enhance heat emission at low supply temperatures, yet device-level studies rarely quantify thermal gains together with hydraulic costs under matched baselines. This study experimentally investigates the coupled thermal and hydraulic response of a PCCP Type-22 panel radiator operated under continuous and on–off pulsating flow regimes. A dedicated test loop was developed using a temperature-controlled hot-water tank (50 °C setpoint) and an Arduino-based driver to impose repeatable pulsation, while measuring inlet/outlet temperatures, instantaneous flow rate, pump electrical energy, and spatiotemporal surface temperatures via infrared thermography. The results show that increasing the continuous flow rate provides the highest absolute heat output, but at the cost of increased pumping energy. In contrast, pulsating operation improves the thermal–hydraulic balance by increasing heat delivery relative to the reference case while reducing pump energy consumption. Among the tested pulsating cases, short-period pulsation produced the most favorable behavior by maintaining a warmer and more spatially stable radiator surface. Longer off-periods promoted deeper surface cooling, reduced the effective emitting area, and weakened the thermal benefit of pulsation. Infrared thermography confirmed that the pulsation period strongly affects surface-temperature uniformity and temporal stability. Overall, short-period on–off pulsation emerges as the most favorable operating mode when the objective is to increase heat delivery while lowering pumping energy in PCCP-type radiators.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11291Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKöksal, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorCeviz, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorMuratçobanoğlu, Burak
dc.contributor.authorMandev, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:08:13.917015208Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:08:13.917015208Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPulsating water-side flow has been proposed as a radiator control strategy to enhance heat emission at low supply temperatures, yet device-level studies rarely quantify thermal gains together with hydraulic costs under matched baselines. This study experimentally investigates the coupled thermal and hydraulic response of a PCCP Type-22 panel radiator operated under continuous and on–off pulsating flow regimes. A dedicated test loop was developed using a temperature-controlled hot-water tank (50 °C setpoint) and an Arduino-based driver to impose repeatable pulsation, while measuring inlet/outlet temperatures, instantaneous flow rate, pump electrical energy, and spatiotemporal surface temperatures via infrared thermography. The results show that increasing the continuous flow rate provides the highest absolute heat output, but at the cost of increased pumping energy. In contrast, pulsating operation improves the thermal–hydraulic balance by increasing heat delivery relative to the reference case while reducing pump energy consumption. Among the tested pulsating cases, short-period pulsation produced the most favorable behavior by maintaining a warmer and more spatially stable radiator surface. Longer off-periods promoted deeper surface cooling, reduced the effective emitting area, and weakened the thermal benefit of pulsation. Infrared thermography confirmed that the pulsation period strongly affects surface-temperature uniformity and temporal stability. Overall, short-period on–off pulsation emerges as the most favorable operating mode when the objective is to increase heat delivery while lowering pumping energy in PCCP-type radiators.
dc.identifier.articlenumber132288
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.132288
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5606
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043976586
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11291
dc.identifier.volume303
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001823013800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Thermal Engineering
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEnergy efficiency
dc.subjectLow-temperature heating
dc.subjectOn–off flow control
dc.subjectPanel radiator
dc.subjectPulsating flow
dc.subjectThermal–hydraulic performance
dc.subject.classificationThermodynamics
dc.subject.classificationEnergy & Fuels
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Mechanical
dc.subject.classificationMechanics
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.otherEnergy utilization
dc.subject.otherFlow control
dc.subject.otherFlow rate
dc.subject.otherPumps
dc.subject.otherRadiators
dc.subject.otherSurface properties
dc.subject.otherSurface testing
dc.subject.otherTemperature
dc.subject.otherThermography (imaging)
dc.subject.otherContinuous-flow
dc.subject.otherEnergy
dc.subject.otherHeat delivery
dc.subject.otherLow temperature heating
dc.subject.otherOn–off flow control
dc.subject.otherPanel radiator
dc.subject.otherPulsating flow
dc.subject.otherPumping energies
dc.subject.otherSurface temperatures
dc.subject.otherThermal-hydraulic performance
dc.subject.otherEnergy efficiency
dc.titleComparative thermal and hydraulic performance of Type-22 panel radiators under continuous and pulsating flow
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/8534
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG07
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)