Low-Data Modeling of Shallow Foundations on Cohesive Slopes: A Comparison between Hybrid FEM–RSM and ML Models*

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ3
  • SDG 9 · Sanayi, Yenilikçilik ve Altyapı

Özet

In geotechnical engineering, accurately predicting the seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive slopes requires proper consideration of nonlinear effects and parameter interactions. However, most studies in the literature address these complex effects inadequately, either with numerical methods that demand a large number of analyses or with machine learning (ML) models that require large and heterogeneous data sets. In this study, it is aimed to propose an approach that allows for a robust analysis of the system and at the same time provides accurate forecasting for situations where working with small and homogeneous data sets is mandatory. Within the scope of the study, seismic bearing capacity analyses were performed using Plaxis 2D for 273 cases where eight independent variables took different values according to the Face Centered Composite Design (FCCD), and a database was created. Multiple Linear (MLR), Multiple Nonlinear (MNLR) Regression Models were established, and ML models, such as Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were trained. The models were compared with both in-sample and out-of-sample estimation performance, and parametric sensitivity analyses were evaluated by methods such as ANOVA and SHAP. The results show that the MNLR model with natural logarithmic transformation is the most successful method in terms of both accuracy (R² ≈ 0.98) and reflecting parameter interactions, while the SVR algorithm demonstrates the best generalization ability among ML models under low-data conditions. The results also confirm that the ML models effectively capture the parameter effects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11168Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1711510Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
TR Dizin
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKâmiloğlu, Hakan Alper
dc.contributor.authorGücüyener, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T19:08:06.883399819Z
dc.date.available2026-10-29T19:08:06.883399819Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractIn geotechnical engineering, accurately predicting the seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive slopes requires proper consideration of nonlinear effects and parameter interactions. However, most studies in the literature address these complex effects inadequately, either with numerical methods that demand a large number of analyses or with machine learning (ML) models that require large and heterogeneous data sets. In this study, it is aimed to propose an approach that allows for a robust analysis of the system and at the same time provides accurate forecasting for situations where working with small and homogeneous data sets is mandatory. Within the scope of the study, seismic bearing capacity analyses were performed using Plaxis 2D for 273 cases where eight independent variables took different values according to the Face Centered Composite Design (FCCD), and a database was created. Multiple Linear (MLR), Multiple Nonlinear (MNLR) Regression Models were established, and ML models, such as Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were trained. The models were compared with both in-sample and out-of-sample estimation performance, and parametric sensitivity analyses were evaluated by methods such as ANOVA and SHAP. The results show that the MNLR model with natural logarithmic transformation is the most successful method in terms of both accuracy (R² ≈ 0.98) and reflecting parameter interactions, while the SVR algorithm demonstrates the best generalization ability among ML models under low-data conditions. The results also confirm that the ML models effectively capture the parameter effects.
dc.identifier.doi10.18400/tjce.1711510
dc.identifier.endpage79
dc.identifier.issn2822-6836
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105037928092
dc.identifier.startpage47
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11168
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001761218700003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Chamber of Civil Engineers
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Civil Engineering
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectfinite element method
dc.subjectresponse surface methodology
dc.subjectSeismic bearing capacity
dc.subjectsoft computing methods
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Civil
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.otherArtificial intelligence
dc.subject.otherGeotechnical engineering
dc.subject.otherLearning systems
dc.subject.otherMetadata
dc.subject.otherNonlinear analysis
dc.subject.otherParameter estimation
dc.subject.otherRegression analysis
dc.subject.otherSeismic design
dc.subject.otherSeismology
dc.subject.otherSensitivity analysis
dc.subject.otherSoft computing
dc.subject.otherData set
dc.subject.otherElement method
dc.subject.otherGeotechnical
dc.subject.otherHybrid FEM
dc.subject.otherMachine learning models
dc.subject.otherParameter interactions
dc.subject.otherResponse-surface methodology
dc.subject.otherSeismic bearing capacity
dc.subject.otherShallow foundations
dc.subject.otherSoft computing methods
dc.subject.otherBearing capacity
dc.subject.otherFinite element method
dc.titleLow-Data Modeling of Shallow Foundations on Cohesive Slopes: A Comparison between Hybrid FEM–RSM and ML Models*
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4924785
rdl.scopus.quartileQ3
rdl.sdgSDG09
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)