<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-29T23:52:13Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/14485" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/14485</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-29T20:01:40Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_bayburt_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_bayburt_10001</setSpec><setSpec>com_bayburt_10010</setSpec><setSpec>col_bayburt_10219</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Global Financial Architecture Under Geopolitical, Financial and Policy Pressures: A Capacity-Pressure Index of Financial Resilience</dc:title><dc:creator>Kuzu, Mehmet</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kocaoglu, Fatih</dc:creator><dc:subject>global financial architecture</dc:subject><dc:subject>financial resilience</dc:subject><dc:subject>geopolitical risk</dc:subject><dc:subject>policy uncertainty</dc:subject><dc:subject>financial stress</dc:subject><dc:subject>structural capacity</dc:subject><dc:subject>composite index</dc:subject><dc:subject>SDG 10.5</dc:subject><dc:description>Financial resilience depends on both prevailing pressures and the resources available to maintain financial functions. This study proposes a Global Financial Resilience Index (GFRI) that combines selected structural indicators with the inverse of geopolitical, policy, and market pressures. The formal retrospective sample covers January 2000-June 2026; July-August extensions are reported separately. Fixed-reference standardisation and geometric aggregation produce a transparent capacity-pressure composite, not a measure of environmental, social or intergenerational sustainability. Fixed-basket comparisons retain some capacity improvement, but a balanced five-indicator panel covers only 20 economies and 12.4-16.0% of global GDP. Country selection and calibration alter the pandemic-era ranking. The OECD growth-cycle mean difference is -8.30 points with HAC(12) p = 0.055. Classification AUC is 0.658, with a 12-month block-bootstrap 95% interval of 0.468-0.821, and does not improve on matched stress benchmarks. The incremental explanatory power of industrial production is negligible. Weight simulations and publication-lag tests reveal uncertainty in material construction. The index offers a reproducible description of selected capacity and pressure conditions; the evidence does not support operational policy bands, superior crisis prediction or comprehensive sustainability claims.</dc:description><dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/14485</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.3390/su181910159</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>SUSTAINABILITY</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/bayburt/14485</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>