<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-30T01:52:20Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/12729" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/12729</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-29T19:42:41Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_bayburt_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_bayburt_10001</setSpec><setSpec>com_bayburt_10007</setSpec><setSpec>col_bayburt_10223</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Life cycle cost and carbon footprint analysis of CuO–Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluids in thermoelectric vaccine refrigerators</dc:title><dc:creator>Cuce, Pinar Mert</dc:creator><dc:creator>Guclu, Tamer</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cuce, Erdem</dc:creator><dc:subject>Carbon footprint reduction</dc:subject><dc:subject>CuO–Al&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; hybrid nanofluid</dc:subject><dc:subject>Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA)</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thermoelectric cooling</dc:subject><dc:subject>Vaccine refrigeration</dc:subject><dc:description>This study investigates the application of a CuO–Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluid as a coolant in thermoelectric vaccine refrigerators, aiming to enhance heat dissipation from the Peltier module’s hot side. A 35-L cooling cabinet was utilised, and experimental comparisons were made using water and a 2% CuO–Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluid. Results show that the vaccine cabinet reaches the target temperature of 4 °C in 990 s with nanofluid, compared to 1200 s with water. The system’s energy consumption was reduced by 18.3%, and carbon emissions decreased by 12.3% over a 15-year lifespan, highlighting its environmental benefits. Despite similar coefficients of performance (COP), the nanofluid system demonstrates enhanced efficiency, shorter cooling times, and long-term sustainability advantages. These findings support the adoption of hybrid nanofluids in thermoelectric cooling applications for energy-efficient and environmentally friendly refrigeration systems.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Springer Science and Business Media B.V.</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/12729</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14361-y</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>1388-6150</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/bayburt/12729</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>