<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-30T03:59:48Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/12024" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/12024</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-29T19:42:08Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_bayburt_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_bayburt_10001</setSpec><setSpec>com_bayburt_10007</setSpec><setSpec>col_bayburt_10223</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Municipal solid waste-based district heating and electricity production: A case study</dc:title><dc:creator>Tozlu, Alperen</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abusoglu, Aysegul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ozahi, Emrah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad</dc:creator><dc:subject>District heating</dc:subject><dc:subject>Municipal solid waste</dc:subject><dc:subject>Power production</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thermodynamic</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thermoeconomic</dc:subject><dc:description>In this paper, municipal solid waste (MSW) based electricity production and district heating (DH) potential of Turkey are considered. Three MSW based waste-to-energy (WtE) scenarios is developed: (i) Scenario-I, a DH system integrated into a gas turbine power plant (GTPP), (ii) Scenario-II, a DH system integrated into an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and (iii) Scenario-III, which is based solely on a DH system. As a result of the thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyzes of these developed scenarios using an existing MSW-based cogeneration facility's actual operating data, the system with the most extended payback period (about 5 years) is found as the GTPP-DH system developed in Scenario-I, which also has the highest investment cost. On the other hand, the system with the shortest payback period (about 2 years) is found as the DH system developed in Scenario-III, which also has the lowest investment cost. Overall exergy efficiencies of the GTTP-DH, ORC-DH, and DH systems are found to be 41.86%, 16.15%, and 31.87%, respectively. When the developed WtE scenarios adapted to the pilot provinces selected from each geographical region of Turkey, it is found that the GTPP system developed in Scenario-I can increase the power generation capacity of MSW plants for each province by about 20%.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier Ltd</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/12024</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126495</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>0959-6526</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Journal of Cleaner Production</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/bayburt/12024</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>