2026-10-30T06:36:18Zhttps://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request

oai:bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:bayburt/110522026-10-29T19:41:22Zopenairedrivercom_bayburt_10000col_bayburt_10001com_bayburt_10010col_bayburt_10224

Comparative analysis of stress distributions and safety factor in tensile test specimens with different notch and hole geometries by finite element methodKorkmaz, Sümeyye ErdemGavgali, EsmaFinite element methodNotched geometrySafety factorStress analysisTitanium alloyThis study analyzes the effects of different notch and hole geometries (V-Notched, U-Notched, circular hole) on stress concentration in Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5) Titanium alloy tensile specimens to provide optimized design recommendations for aerospace and biomedical applications. Finite element method (ANSYS Workbench) was employed to analyze three geometries under 15000 N static tensile loading. Von Mises stress distributions and stress concentration factors (Kt) were calculated and validated against Peterson and Neuber theoretical formulas with average error ±1.5%. Results revealed that V-Notched exhibited highest stress concentration (Kt = 5.78, σmax = 1156 MPa), while circular hole showed lowest (Kt = 2.25, σmax = 454.12 MPa). U-Notched demonstrated intermediate performance (Kt = 2.84, σmax = 995.45 MPa). Increasing notch root radius from 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm achieved 51% reduction in stress concentration factor. Maximum shear stress values were 232.74 MPa, 506.38 MPa, and 640 MPa for circular, U-Notched, and V-Notched respectively, while maximum normal stress values reached 467.06 MPa, 1015.1 MPa, and 1809 MPa. Safety factor analysis showed that circular hole configuration meets aerospace standards (FS = 2.05 > 1.5), while U-Notched (FS = 0.93) and V-Notched (FS = 0.80) fall below minimum safety criteria. U-Notched exhibited highest total displacement (1.210 mm), indicating compliance effects. For aerospace and biomedical applications, circular holes should be preferred over sharp notches (154% stress reduction), and minimum corner radius ≥2.0 mm is recommended. The critical finding that geometric optimization provides 2.6× safety improvement without material changes demonstrates the powerful role of design in structural reliability for weight-critical applications.Gumushane University2026Articlehttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/bayburt/11052https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.17993202146-538XenGumushane Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://bayburt-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/bayburt/11052